History of Finland - the motherland of Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Scotland, Ireland, England etc.

Posts

Showing posts from May, 2023

Atheist* (like most Brits, and with Anglo-Saxon DNA) Peter Klevius to figurehead King (i.e. opposite to absolute monarch) Charles 3: Tone down the destructive "faith" propaganda!

May 06, 2023

* Atheism is not a "conviction" as BBC calls it, but the lack of belief in supernaturals such as "ghost" or "god" etc. meaningless words. Only a quarter of people in UK believe in a "god" - and most of them are elederly. Instead, Charles, celebrate the year 1948 when you and the Universal Human Rights Declaration were born! Celebrating "god" is fertilizing hate and terror! And Charles please, ask for forgivness for all the atrocities England has done on the British Isles and around the world - especially the less talked about, e.g. like the opium wars, and how England was an accomplice to the islamic slave trade which is the worst ideologically based crime against humanity ever. Also please mention all the Communists and other people who together constituted probably more than the Jews in the same Holocaust but whose suffering and death is sadly not talked about at all. And do apologize for the victims of the British horr

Trying to understand the polarizing and warmongering without incl. the consequences of US 1971 $-theft - which are now coming home to roost because of China's superior R&D - is an equation without an x. From a pro-war politician's mouth always comes a copy of the original in US. US inflamed the existing racial tensions in Ukraine for the purpose of getting US nukes and US anti-nuke missiles on Russia's border, so to protect itself in its planned war against China - because only by creating a similar chaos as in WW2 on the Eurasian continent would US be able to continue its stolen dollar hegemony.

Finland - the motherland* of Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Holland, England, Scotland, Ireland etc.

The muslim scimitar against the "infidel". Or today, Saudi islamofascism (Saudi based OIC sharia) against Human Rights. This has been made possible by OIC officially abandoning Human Rights in 1990, and EU's s.c. Mediterranean treaty that paved the way not only for an unregulated immigration of muslims from Middle East and Africa, but also for the stifling of criticism against islam (compare OIC's urge to criminalize the new "illness" it had diagnosed and called "islamophobia"). The scimitar on Finland's and Karelia's coat of arms symbolizes the evil of islam - not Russia* (although Ivan was terrible, he wasn't an ideology). Before the appearance of the scimitar trampling lion on the coat of arms of Finland, muslim Tatar warriors (on the pic) carrying scimitars* repeatedly attacked and pillaged the southern coast of Finland with devastating effect on the locals. * Tatars used by Russia (Muscovite) carried Cossack style sabers, not scimitars. Finland's coat of arms (top right) is first known from the 1580s (on Gustav Vasa's tomb in Uppsala cathedral), while the Karelian coat of arms (below Finland's) was seen already in 1562. Uppsala cathedral was built after the Viking age on top of Sweden's original sacred non-Christian site. Uppsala was the natural and closest connection from Finland via the archipelago (see Peter Klevius Finland-Swedish history lesson about Kvenland). The symbol of the lion is derived from the coat of arms of the Folkunga family, and included in the royal arms of Sweden. The beginning of the Folkunga family is said to be traced to Fornjotr, the King of Kvenland and Gotland (ca 160-240 AD). Finland-Swedish Leif Tengström made a desperate 1,000 page long effort in his thesis Muschoviten-- Turcken icke olijk": Ryssattribut, och deras motbilder, i svensk heraldik från Gustav Vasa till freden i Stolbova (1997 - ("The Muscowite, not unlike the Turk" : Russian attributes in Swedish heraldry from Gustavus Vasa [1523] to the peace-treaty of Stolbova [1617]. Diss. -- Jyväskylä University) - trying to disprove a much better Finland-Swedish historian, Matti Klinge, who already 1981 established the scimitar on the weapon as representing muslims. Tengström vehemently opposed this view but after a decade long research he had to admit his failure but covered it up in a charlatanic excuse, i.e. that the scimitar just represented a general western xenophobia against both Russia and islam. In fact, Tatar warriors were all over the place, even fighting for the Muscovites, but they can't possibly have been the prototype for the muslim scimitar on the coat of arms. Tatar muslim warriors were sent to Arabia to learn how to hate "infidels" - and then utilized by a Swedish/Polish king (Sigismund II Augustus) who said he "liked the muslim way of keeping with old customs". Peter Klevius: Reminds me of how the islamofascist Saudi dictator family still today uses the old islamic method of "teaching" hate against the "infidels" (compare Rohyngia jihadis, Sri Lankan jihadis, Uyghur jihadis etc. - or just any Sunni jihadi all over the world.

From US "exorbitant dollar privilege" (financial abuse of vulnerable countries - but the dollar still connected to gold) 1944-, to US financial fraud 1971- (US self-indulgent disconnection of the dollar value from gold after having spent too much on wars and space race etc.). US' "China threat" demonizing is now code for US own threat, i.e. US masking its own desperation when losing its 1971- stolen dollar hegemony because of China's growing high tech superiority. How many understand this simple truth - and how many blink it?! Before 1971 there was only one world-dollar (since Bretton Woods 1944). After the "Nixon chock" 1971 there were two: One for US dictated by US (Feds), and an other for the rest of the world, also dictated by US. And the difference was that the US-dollar made it possible for US to prosper despite trade deficit, because the rest of the world has paid the difference. Also do recognize that Roosewelt's similar move 1933 happened before the Bretton Woods agreement.

Forget about Nature! Here you get your by far most qualified and least biased (not steered by peer "reviews" or PC editors, but by super high IQ not corrupted by religion, politics or money) scientific overall understanding of evolution (1981), human evolution (1992-), consciousness (1992-94) and AI (1979-), and Human Rights (1979- incl. sex segregation). In his topics of scientific interest Peter Klevius has got highest possible recommendations from world leading professors on the topics. And no, the author has never been caught with mental problems, abuse or criminality, and has successfully fostered all of his children. So why presenting himself like this?! Simply because his best services to science can't get properly through via other media, and here it's often dismissed as "just a blogger's opinion" - which is quite rich when considering much peer reviewed nonsense PC "science" allowed on Nature! And non-scientific posts here of course utilize the same brain power.

Why is a meritocratic, capitalism and trade supporting, Chinese president, with more than 2/3 approval rating, called a "dictator", while a wild capitalism and protectionism and anti-China sanctions and smearing supporting, militaristic warmongering US president with 1/3 of indirect votes on electors who were chosing among candidates chosen by the big money, is called "democratic"?! It seems that "Christian democracy" is a similarly empty but magic wording as is "the Atheist Communist dictatorship".

Atheist (like the overwhelming majority of Brits) Peter Klevius art analysis: When kings possessed antidemocratic total power (as the Saudi islamofascist murderer and terrorist war criminal "king" still today), they could deliberately show off their personhood. However, when kingdom became art - not to say sign post - then a "good" king or queen became someone who like Elizabeth had to shut up and instead be filled with the content of "the eye of the beholder" - just like art, which is always excluded from its artist. My guess is that she could only really trust her husband - 'husband' is Swedish meaning 'hus' (house) and 'band' means ties like in 'bond'. However, her son Charles has an extremely poor record at that - which may be entertaining, especially for republicans.